Re: Connection pooling
От | Steve Leibel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Connection pooling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | v0421012eb69771e90c7a@[24.168.80.161] обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Connection pooling (Gilles DAROLD <gilles@darold.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
At 12:39 PM +0100 1/26/01, Gilles DAROLD wrote: >Hi, > >Just to repeat that we have this stuff enabled using perl and mod_perl for a >very >long time. Just try to declare all your vars as global (without my or local) >and >see what's append between apache child process :-) > >But as I know Apache::DBI doesn't do db connexion pooling, this is a >mistake. >It just allows you to create persitante connexion. But you can declare >multiple >persistante connection and do a random access to each one if your really >need >to play with that. Personnaly I never had to use that, but I think that with >a site >with a large amout of simoultaneous user it can be usefull. The point is that if two child processes share a connection (which is actually just a TCP or Unix socket) then you have two writers to the same output channel. This is a no-no, since data corruption can result, just as if two writers share an open filehandle for writing. It would in theory be possible for somebody to write a connection pool package for Apache that included proper concurrency control. However Apache::DBI doesn't do that. Steve L
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: